<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New: Free Code section &#8211; and improved Vortex</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.automated-trading-system.com/free-code-improved-vortex/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.automated-trading-system.com/free-code-improved-vortex/</link>
	<description>Systematic Trading research and development, with a flavour of Trend Following</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:06:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jez</title>
		<link>http://www.automated-trading-system.com/free-code-improved-vortex/comment-page-1/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automated-trading-system.com/?p=1693#comment-257</guid>
		<description>@Troy
I was planning to run a comparison with the ADX system in Trading Blox but realised that because of the scaling difference between the ADX and AVX, a true comparison test was not possible (ie the thresholds are different in both systems because the ADX goes from 0 to 100 whereas the AVX does not). However I seem to remember running tests on the ADX system on Trading Blox and unlike the AVX, the ADX filtering was adding some value to the system. Go figure ;-)

I&#039;ll definitely try to keep the blog relevant to non-Trading Blox users. In any case, most of the more fundamental/theoritical discussions here should be software agnostic...

Thanks
Jez</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Troy<br />
I was planning to run a comparison with the ADX system in Trading Blox but realised that because of the scaling difference between the ADX and AVX, a true comparison test was not possible (ie the thresholds are different in both systems because the ADX goes from 0 to 100 whereas the AVX does not). However I seem to remember running tests on the ADX system on Trading Blox and unlike the AVX, the ADX filtering was adding some value to the system. Go figure ;-)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll definitely try to keep the blog relevant to non-Trading Blox users. In any case, most of the more fundamental/theoritical discussions here should be software agnostic&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Jez</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy S.</title>
		<link>http://www.automated-trading-system.com/free-code-improved-vortex/comment-page-1/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 02:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automated-trading-system.com/?p=1693#comment-256</guid>
		<description>Jez,

I&#039;m glad you figured out a way to fix the flaw in the Vortex. I wonder how AVX stacks up against the ADX in other trading systems that involve filtering for trend strength... how does the e-ratio of the TradingBlox ADX system compare?

Continuing to prototype these indicators in Excel is very helpful for us non-TradingBlox owners :)

Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jez,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you figured out a way to fix the flaw in the Vortex. I wonder how AVX stacks up against the ADX in other trading systems that involve filtering for trend strength&#8230; how does the e-ratio of the TradingBlox ADX system compare?</p>
<p>Continuing to prototype these indicators in Excel is very helpful for us non-TradingBlox owners :)</p>
<p>Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

